Does Shariah Supervisory Board Matter in Explaining Islamic Social Reporting by Indonesian Islamic Commercial Banks?

نویسندگان

چکیده

ABSTRACT This study aimed to investigate the impact of Sharia Supervisory Board (SSB) on Islamic Social Responsibility (ISR) by Commercial Banks in Indonesia. Secondary data were collected from annual reports 14 Indonesia 2010 2020, resulting 125 firm-year data. A panel regression was applied analyze The analysis results show that SSB age, cross-membership, and meeting frequency have a positive effect ISR, whereas size has negative effect. However, this did not manage support qualifications (Ph.D.) expertise ISR. findings imply needs increase meetings improve its supervisory function over Shariah banks' management, including encouraging more comprehensive ISR disclosure. contribution research is focuses characteristics using Enterprise Theory (SET) provide better understanding how these factors influence implementation sharia context. Keywords: Characteristics, Reporting, Bank, ABSTRAK Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menyelidiki dampak terhadap Reporting oleh Bank Umum Syariah di Data sekunder dikumpulkan laporan tahunan sejak hingga menghasilkan firm-year. Regresi diterapkan menganalisis Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa usia SSB, lintas keanggotaan, dan frekuensi pertemuan berpengaruh positif pada sedangkan ukuran negatif. Namun hasil tidak mendukung pengaruh kualifikasi keahlian Temuan menyiratkan DPS perlu meningkatkan dalam rangka fungsi pengawasan manajemen bank syariah, termasuk mmendorong pengungkapan yang lebih komprehensif. kontribusi yaitu Penelitian memfokuskan karakteristik dengan menggunakan memberikan pemahaman baik tentang bagaimana faktor-faktor tersebut mempengaruhi pelaksanaan konteks syariah. Kata Kunci: Karakteristik Dewan Pengawas Syariah, Pelaporan Sosial, REFERENCES Abdullah, W. A. W., Percy, M., & Stewart, J. (2013). Shari’ah disclosures Malaysian Indonesian banks governance system. Journal Accounting Business Research, 4(2), 100–131. doi:10.1108/JIABR-10-2012-0063 Adiertanto, C. P., Chariri, Analisis Pengaruh islamic corporate social responsibility (Studi kasus Indonesia). Diponegoro Accounting. Alam, N., Ramachandran, J., Nahomy, H. (2020). agency earnings management – test dual banking Research International Finance, 54. doi:10.1016/j.ribaf.2020.101242 Almutair, R., Quttainah, M. (2017). Corporate : Evidence banks. Journal, 13(3), 601-624. doi:10.1108/SRJ-05-2016-0061 Andika, Aldi. Malaysia bisa bergandengan tangan pengembangan Eksyar. Retrived https://kneks.go.id/ Anisykurlillah, I., Jayanto, P. Y., Mukhibad, H., Widyastuti, U. Examining role board attributes reducing financial statement fraud Systems, 15(3), 106–116. doi:10.21511/bbs.15(3).2020.10 Aracil, E. (2019). conventional banks: institutions emerging countries. Emerging Markets, 14(4), 582–600. doi:10.1108/IJOEM-12-2017-0533 Aribi, Z. A., Arun, T., Gao, S. Accountability institution: reports. 10(1), 98–114. doi:10.1108/JIABR-10-2015-0049 Baklouti, I. Is friend or an enemy ? Marketing, 13(2), 526-541. doi:10.1108/JIMA-04-2020-0118 Basiruddin, Ahmed, non-compliant risk evidence Southeast Asia. Governance, 20(2), 240–262. doi:10.1108/CG-05-2019-0138 Belal, Cooper, Khan, N. (2015). environmental accountability: What chance vulnerable Bangladesh? Critical Perspectives Accounting, 33, 44–58. doi:10.1016/j.cpa.2015.01.005 Billzha, R. (2018). (DPS) profitabilitas syariah Indonesia.Scholar Universitas Andalas. Bukair, Rahman, Effect Directors’ Characteristics Disclosure Banks. Management 7(2), 506-519. doi:10.5296/jmr.v7i2.6989 Choudhury, Hoque, (2006). perspective. 6(2), 116–128. doi:10.1108/14720700610655132 D’Amato, Gallo, institutional setting risk-taking missing directors’ education turnover. 19(4), 774–805. doi:10.1108/CG-01-2019-0013 El-Halaby, S., Hussainey, K. (2016). Determinants Compliance with AAOIFI Standards Middle Eastern Finance Management, 9(1), 143-168. doi:10.1108/IMEFM-06-2015-0074 Farag, Mallin, C., Ow-Yong, New insights for structure relationships. Financial Institutions Money, 54, 59–77. doi:10.1016/j.intfin.2017.08.002 Farook, Hassan, K., Lanis, (2011). disclosure case 2(2), 114–141. doi:10.1108/17590811111170539 Fitria, Hartanti, D. (2010). Islam tanggung jawab sosial studi perbandingan berdasarkan global reporting initiative indeks indeks. Proceeding Simposium Nasional Akuntansi Jenderal Soedirman, Purwokerto. Gaganis, Lozano-Vivas, Papadimitri, Pasiouras, F. Macroprudential policies, risk: Cross-country evidence. Economic Behavior Organization, 169, 126–142. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2019.11.004 Garas, (2012). control Shari’a institutions. 5(1), 8–24. doi:10.1108/17538391211216794 Pierce, supervision Regulation Compliance, 18(4), 386–407. doi:10.1108/13581981011093695 Gatandi, T. Filianti, (2021). Determinan Pengungkapan Pada Di Tahun 2015-2019. Jurnal Ekonomi Teori Dan Terapan, 8(6), 727-742. doi:10.20473/vol8iss20216pp727-742 Ghozali, Ratmono, multivariat ekonometrika teori,konsep,dan aplikasi Eviews 10 (2nd ed.). Semarang: Diponogoro. Grassa, Chakroun, ’ products services 31(1), 75–89. doi:10.1108/ARJ-09-2016-0109 Gustani. Model pelaporan kinerja perbankan syariah: Implementasi Indek JAKIS: Keuangan Islam, 2(1), 35-49. doi.org/10.35836/jakis.v2i1.51 Haniffa, (2002). disclosure: An In 1(2), 128–146. Helfaya, Kotb, Hanafi, Qur’anic ethics responsibility: implications business practice. Ethics, 150(4), 1105–1128. doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3195-6 Hussain, Rehman, Sahib Zada, Malik, Khattak, Pakistan. Law 63(1), 1–15. doi:10.1108/IJLMA-02-2020-0060 Johnson, G., Schnatterly, Hill, D., composition beyond independence capital, human demographics. 39(1), 232–262. doi:10.1177/0149206312463938 Khoirudin, social. Analysis 227–232. doi:10.15294/aaj.v2i2.2919 Kirana, Prasetyo, B. Analyzing characteristics, ownership company characteristic CSR 62–70. doi:10.15294/aaj.v10i1.41944 Koka, Giorgioni, Farquhar, (2022). trade-off between knowledge accumulation independence: within firm performance nexus. 59(101549). doi:10.1016/j.ribaf.2021.101549 Kusuma, Rosadi, performance. Banking, 164–179. doi:10.22515/jfib.v1i2.1493 Lestari, Case Invention, 2(10), 28–34. Manaseer, Al, Al-Hindawi, Al-Dahiyat, Sartawi, Jordanian Scientific 67(3), 349–359. Meiyana, Aisyah, lingkungan, biaya perusahaan keuangan sebagai variabel intervening. Nominal: Barometer Riset Manajemen, 8(1), 1–18. doi:10.21831/nominal.v8i1.24495 Meutia, Febrianti, banking: Stakeholders theory 17th Annual Conference Asian Academic Association, 34(12001), 8. doi: 10.1051/shsconf/20173412001 Mnif, Tahari, banks’ specific mechanisms compliance standards. 12(1), 21–43. doi:10.1108/JIABR-11-2018-0188 Muhammad, Annuar, Taufik, Nugraheni, SSB’s toward Cogent 8(1). doi:10.1080/23311975.2021.1929033 Peran Sosial Reporting. Multiparadigma (JAMAL), 9(2), 299–311. doi:10.18202/jamal.2018.04.9018 Fitri, Determinant Disclosure. Economics, Education 2019, KnE Sciences, 478–489. doi:10.18502/kss.v4i6.6620 fraud: Governance Regulation, 10(2), 361–368. doi:10.22495/jgrv10i2siart16 Suryarini, Bagas, accountability based disclosure-a 9(1). doi:10.1080/23311975.2022.2080151 Nurkhin, Fachrurrozie, F., Y. (2023). Open innovation shariah - Does matter? Innovation: Technology, Market, Complexity, 100014. doi:10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100014 Setiawan, Could risk, governance, enhance Indian 24–38. doi:10.17010/ijf/2020/v14i4/151706 Rahmawati, Rochmatullah, Warsina. Accounting-based Monetary Economics 213-231. doi:10.1504/IJMEF.2022.126902 Naheed, AlHares, Shahab, Board’s China. Expertise China, 21(4), 716–736. doi:10.1108/CG-08-2020-0329 Nomran, Haron, effects performance: Malaysia. 36(2), 290–304. doi:10.1108/IJBM-12-2016-0197 Khasanah, Implementation index 17(3), 365–382. doi:10.1108/JFRA-02-2018-0013 OJK. Laporan perkembangan Retrieved https://www.ojk.go.id/id/kanal/syariah/data-dan-statistik/laporan-perkembangan-keuangan-syariah-indonesia/Pages/Laporan-Perkembangan-Keuangan-Syariah-Indonesia-2021.aspx Othman, Thani, listed companies 9(4), 135–144. doi:10.19030/iber.v9i4.561 Ghani, (2009). among top shariah- approved Bursa. Studies, 12(12), 4–20. Oware, Vitor, CEO firms economy: sustainability format Strategy Development, 4(4), 399–410. doi:10.1002/bsd2.166 Pakpahan, Rajagukguk, L. profitabilitas, perusahaan, dewan komisaris, media exposure sosial. Akuntansi, 18(2), 197–218. Prabowo, Jamin, Saputro, Mufraini, Agustia, Female executive officers industry market. Global Advancement, 10(6), 631–651. Prastiwi. pengawas Rasio Non-Performing (NPF) Syariah. Repository Perpustakaan Gajah Mada. Rahajeng, governance: model finance SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2366722 Rahayu, sri, Cahyati, (2014). Faktor-faktor responsibility. 3(1), 56–76. doi:10.54964/liabilitas.v3i1.32 Abdul, Influence Gulf Co-Operation Council Countries. 65–104. Ramadhani, leverage Iislamic empiris umum tahun 2010-2014). JOM Fekon, 2487–2500. Rashid, U., Khanam, Ullah, IFSB standard-4: Bangladesh. 15(1), 1–17. doi:10.1108/IMEFM-03-2020-0124 Risqi, Septriarini, 8(4), 413-425. doi:10.20473/vol8iss20214pp413-425 Rizk, ethics. 5(2), 194–204. doi:10.1108/JIABR-09-2012-0060 Rosiana, Arifin, B., Hamdani, leverage, score Empiris 2010-2012). Bisnis 87–104. doi:10.15408/ess.v5i1.2334 Safiullah, Funding Liquidity board’s higher educational attainment Pacific-Basin 78. doi:10.1016/j.pacfin.2023.101976 Shamsuddin, Risk governance. 47, 129–149. doi:10.1016/j.pacfin.2017.12.008 Sugiono, Metode kuantitatif, kualitatif, R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta CV. Triyuwono, (2001). Metafora zakat konsep dasar membentuk akuntansi syari’ah. Auditing (JAAI), 131–145. Valente, Atkinson, Sustainability business: millennials’ Modern Auditing, 15(6), 293–304. doi:10.17265/1548-6583/2019.06.002 Veltrop, Molleman, E., Reggy, Hooghiemstra, Ees, Van. Who’s boss at top? micro-level director expertise, status conformity boards. 54(7), 1079–1110. Wang, Su, X., Chen, liquidity: boards Taiwan. Review Quantitative 49, 463–485. doi:10.1007/s11156-016-0597-6 Wijayanti, Sustainability, 14(7), 1–25. doi:10.3390/su141710965

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Mode of Islamic Bank Financing: Does Effectiveness of Shari’ah Supervisory Board Matter?

This paper examines the relationships between the effectiveness of board (SSB), their remuneration and mode of financing effectiveness is evaluated by an index based on 9 attributes score. This study comprises 18 Islamic banks in which operating in Malaysia from the year 2012 to 2014 a sample. Our regression analysis shows that the effectiveness of SSB does not concern with the mode of Islamic ...

متن کامل

Shari’ah Supervisory Board Composition Effects On Islamic Banks’ Risk-Taking Behavior

Islamic banks underlie the fundamental principles of the Shari’ah, which encompass all business activities, financial contracts, and transactions. The Shari’ah Supervisory Board (SSB) monitors and certifies compliancy and is unique to the governance structure of Islamic banks compared to their Western counterparts. This study addresses the question of how the compositional characteristics of th...

متن کامل

Islamic Legislation and Objectives of Shariah

The Study of this deeply thought and compiled article is no doubt equal to the study of several bulky books regarding Islamic Legislation. First of all, the origin and definition of the word "Law" is a wonderful effort. The definition and detailed account of the objectives of Shriah occupies the status of the main plot of this article. This main plot has been well supported by Quranic verses an...

متن کامل

Deficiency Risk in Islamic and Conventional Banks

In this article, we have elaborated a study over the nature of financial intermediation in Islamic banks by comparison to those of conventional ones. We have found a striking difference between two kinds of intermediation. We tried, from another side, to study the relationship between the capital level and deficiency risk relying on econometric model, and we have obtained a positive and signifi...

متن کامل

Failure Risk in Islamic and Conventional Banks

This study compares the hazard of failure in Islamic and conventional commercial banks using survival models. The sample consists of 421 banks from 20 Middle and Far Eastern countries observed during the 1995 to 2010 period. The conditioning variables are of both bank-level and country-level type. The analysis suggests that Islamic banks have lower failure risk and are less interconnected which...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah Teori Terapan

سال: 2023

ISSN: ['2502-1508', '2407-1935']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20473/vol10iss20233pp235-248